US District Court for the Central District of California Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 4,730
Ed Odin v. Kohls Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Ed Odin
Defendant:
KOHL'S INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Lynsey Saurenmann v. City of Hope
as 2:2024cv02860
Plaintiff:
Lynsey Saurenmann
Defendant:
City of Hope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Tammy L. Julian v. City of Hope National Medical Center
as 2:2024cv02898
Plaintiff:
Tammy L. Julian
Defendant:
City of Hope National Medical Center doing business as City of Hope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Cicely Martin v. Gjuan Martin
as 2:2024cv02834
Plaintiff:
Cicely Martin
Defendant:
Gjuan Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mauricio M. Joffre v. Keenan and Associates et al
as 2:2024cv02853
Plaintiff:
Mauricio M. Joffre
Defendant:
Keenan and Associates and Does 1 through 100, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Mitch Taebel v. Joe Biden
as 2:2024cv02875
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Maria Moreno v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02766
Plaintiff:
Maria Moreno
Defendant:
Walmart Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
PINOCOMBE v. COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION,
as 2:2024cv02801
Plaintiff:
YESENIA PINOCOMBE
Defendant:
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Richard Chang et al v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
Richard Chang and Duangjai Chang
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Douglas Downey v. Sonesta Hotel International Corporation
as 2:2024cv02781
Plaintiff:
Douglas Downey
Defendant:
Sonesta Hotel International Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Non-Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
