U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Waked, et al v. Kerr, et al
as 24-2064
Plaintiff:
SHAWN JEREMY WAKED and THERESA IRENE STONE
Defendant:
KATHLEEN ALEXANDRIA KERR, TIMOTHY JAMES RIVERA and JANE TERRY
Shenzhen Gooloo v. Pilot
as 24-1135
Not Yet Classified:
SHENZHEN GOOLOO E-COMMERCE CO. LTD. and PILOT, INC.
Merit Energy Operations I v. Eastern Shoshone Tribe, et al
as 23-8070
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MERIT ENERGY OPERATIONS I LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
EASTERN SHOSHONE TRIBE and NORTHERN ARAPAHO TRIBE
Choice Investment Management v. Atea-Brookline, et al
as 23-1317
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHOICE INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Colorado limited liability company
Respondent / Appellee:
ATEA-BROOKLINE, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and ATEA-BROOKLINE MANAGER, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Goldgroup Resource v. Dynaresource De Mexico, et al
as 23-1179
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GOLDGROUP RESOURCES, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
DYNARESOURCE DE MEXICO, S.A. DE C.V. and DYNARESOURCE, INC.
Waked, et al v. Kerr, et al
as 23-2036
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SHAWN JEREMY WAKED and THERESA IRENE STONE
Defendant / Appellant:
KATHLEEN ALEXANDRIA KERR, TIMOTHY JAMES RIVERA and JANE TERRY
Romero v. Union Pacific Railroad
as 23-8015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD P. ROMERO
Defendant / Appellee:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD
Matios v. City of Loveland
as 22-1394
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EYOEL-DAWIT MATIOS, et al., in sui juris capacity
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LOVELAND, et al., in care of Stephen C. Adams, City Manager
IPF Sourcing v. Botani-Labs
as 22-1347
Plaintiff / Appellee:
IPF SOURCING, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
BOTANI-LABS, LLC
Matios v. City of Loveland
as 22-1242
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EYOEL-DAWIT MATIOS, et al., in sui juris capacity
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF LOVELAND, et al., in care of Stephen C. Adams, City Manager
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
