U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Contract Cases

Franchise Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Wetzel's Pretzels, LLC, et al v. Ken Cramer, et al
as 10-55474
Defendant-cross-claimant - Appellant: T.C. MULTIFOODS, INC., a Florida corporation and KEN CRAMER, an individual
Plaintiff-cross-defendant - Appellee: WETZEL'S PRETZELS, LLC, a Califronia limited liability company, BILL PHELPS, an individual, VINCENT MONTANELLI, an individual and others
Type: Contract Franchise
Samica Enterprises LLC, et al v. Mail Boxes Etc., Inc., et al
as 10-55433
Plaintiff / Appellant: SAMICA ENTERPRISES LLC, an Illinois Limited Liability Company, EXTEX, INC., a New Hampshire Corporation, JAMAR ENTERPRISES, INC., a Missiouri corporation and others
Type: Contract Franchise
Samica Enterprises LLC, et al v. Mail Boxes Etc., Inc., et al
as 10-55433
Plaintiff - Appellant: SAMICA ENTERPRISES LLC, an Illinois Limited Liability Company, EXTEX, INC., a New Hampshire Corporation, JAMAR ENTERPRISES, INC., a Missiouri corporation and others
Defendant - Appellee: MAIL BOXES ETC., INC., a Delaware corporation, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, a Delaware franchise corporation, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., a Ohio franchise corporation and others
Type: Contract Franchise
H&R Block Tax Services, LLC, et al v. Kathryn Kutzman
as 10-35141
Plaintiff - Appellee: H&R BLOCK TAX SERVICES, LLC and FRANCHISE PARTNER, INC.
Defendant - Appellant: KATHRYN KUTZMAN
Type: Contract Franchise
Ben & Jerry's Franchising, Inc, et al v. Mehrdad Porghavami, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-17826
Defendant: MPA GROUP, INC., a California corporation
Defendant - Appellee: WONDER ICE CREAM LLC
Defendant-cross-defendant: BEN & JERRY'S OF CALIFORNIA INC. AND WONDER ICE CREAM LLC
Defendant-cross-claimant - Appellant: MEHRDAD PORGHAVAMI
Plaintiff-cross-defendant - Appellee: BEN & JERRY'S FRANCHISING, INC., a Vermont corporation and BEN & JERRY'S HOMEMADE, INC., a Vermont corporation
Type: Contract Franchise
Sonitrol National Dealer's Ass v. Sonitrol Corporation, et al
as 09-35688
Plaintiff: SOUND SECURITY INC, a Washington corporation
Intervenor - Appellant: SONITROL NATIONAL DEALER'S ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellee: SONITROL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, SONITROL HOLDING CORPORATION, SONITROL HOLDING, LLC and others
Type: Contract Franchise
Loren Taylor, et al v. 1-800-Got-Junk?, LLC
as 09-35661
Plaintiff - Appellant: LOREN TAYLOR and SAGE TAYLOR, husband and wife
Defendant - Appellee: 1-800-GOT-JUNK?, LLC, A Delaware limited liability company
Type: Contract Franchise
Abdul Ahussain, et al v. General Nutrition Corporation, et al
as 09-56030
Plaintiff - Appellant: ABDUL AHUSSAIN, an individual; and on behalf of all others similarly situated, GHULAM ABBAS, an individual; and on behalf of all others similarly situated, MASSIE KHODAKHAH, an individual; and on behalf of all others similarly situated, AKA Marcie Khodakhah and others
Defendant - Appellee: GENERAL NUTRITION CORPORATION, a Pennsylvania corporation and GNC FRANCHISING, LLC, a Pennsylvania limited liability company
Type: Contract Franchise
Pacific Fuel Company, LLC v. Shell Oil Company, et al
as 09-55746
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellant: PACIFIC FUEL COMPANY, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellee: SHELL OIL COMPANY, a Delaware corporation and EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLC
Third-party-defendant - Appellant: LEIGHTON HULL, individually
Type: Contract Franchise
Pacific Fuel Company, LLC v. Shell Oil Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-55640
Plaintiff-counter-defendant - Appellee: PACIFIC FUEL COMPANY, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company
Defendant-counter-claimant - Appellant: SHELL OIL COMPANY, a Delaware corporation and EQUILON ENTERPRISES LLC
Third-party-defendant - Appellee: LEIGHTON HULL, individually
Type: Contract Franchise

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?