US District Court for the Central District of California Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 84,678
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Heiting v. Melissa & Doug, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03695
Plaintiff:
Anne Heiting
Defendant:
Melissa & Doug, LLC and Does 1 through 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
M J Rabadi Freeway Gas Inc. v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv03693
Plaintiff:
M J Rabadi Freeway Gas Inc.
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Matthew E Orso v. Todd Disner et al
as 2:2024cv03632
Plaintiff:
Matthew E Orso In his capacity as court-appointed Receiver for Rex Venture Group, LLC doing business as ZeekRewards.com
Petitioner:
Nationwide Judgment Recovery Inc
Defendant:
Todd Disner, Trudy Gilmond, Trudy Gilmond, LLC and others
Bennett et al v. TestMax, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03662
Plaintiff:
Alvoid Bennett and Regine Urcia
Defendant:
TestMax, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lipp, Jr. v. Pinpoint Offers USA LLC
as 8:2024cv00940
Plaintiff:
Richard Lipp, Jr.
Defendant:
Pinpoint Offers USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00925
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
