US District Court for the Eastern District of California Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 979
Benton v. BBBB Bonding Corp., et al
as 2:2024at00562
Plaintiff:
Michael Benton
Defendant:
BBBB Bonding Corporation, Clifford Jeffery Stanley and Robert Hill-Venn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Benton v. BBBB Bonding Corp., et al
as 2:2024cv01294
Plaintiff:
Michael Benton
Defendant:
BBBB Bonding Corporation, Clifford Jeffery Stanley and Robert Hill-Venn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
McKnight v. Park My Fleet LLC
as 1:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Giavanni McKnight
Defendant:
Park My Fleet LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Hoffman v. Transform Sears Home Services, LLC
as 2:2024cv00952
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hoffman
Defendant:
Transform Sears Home Services, LLC
Su v. Fast Trip Sacramento, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00761
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Su
Defendant:
Fast Trip Sacramento, Inc. Doing business as Fast Trip Food Store and Amrik Singh
Hunter v. Petro-Lud, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Cleo Hunter
Defendant:
Petro-Lud, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Yanez-Davison v. UPS, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03016
Plaintiff:
Christina Yanez-Davison
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Jeff Davies and Joseph Dalia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Chocktoot et al v. Arden Glen Healthcare, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv02992
Plaintiff:
Desiree Chocktoot, Darneece Veazey, Leslie Johnson and others
Defendant:
Arden Glen Healthcare, LLC, Riley Corbin and Natalie Law
Nanthavong v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02670
Plaintiff:
Saysamone Nanthavong
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Justin Minor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Bonk v. Sacramento Media, LLC et al
as 2:2023at01098
Plaintiff:
Lisa Bonk
Defendant:
Sacramento Media, LLC and Stefan Wanczyk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
