US District Court for the Northern District of California Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 2,278
Cook v. Black et al
as 3:2023cv04934
Plaintiff:
Amy Cook
Defendant:
Steven D. Black, Mark A. Chancy, Celeste A. Clarke and others
Petitioner:
Asbestos Workers Philadelphia Welfare and Pension Fund and Jose F. Isais
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Cenderelli v. Archer Aviation, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv04844
Plaintiff:
Ken Cenderelli
Defendant:
Archer Aviation, Inc., Adam Goldstein, Brett Adcock and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. NDB, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv04724
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
NDB, Inc. and Nima Golsharifi
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Tirado v. Proterra Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv04528
Plaintiff:
Tanya Tirado
Defendant:
Proterra Inc., Gareth T. Joyce, Karina Franco Padilla and others
Petitioner:
Cyress Jam
Bhangal v. Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv04332
Plaintiff:
Bhapinderpal S. Bhangal
Defendant:
Hawaiian Electric Industries, Inc., Constance H. Lau, Scott W. H. Seu and others
Panovski v. Inpixon et al
as 3:2023cv04330
Plaintiff:
Orlin Panovski
Defendant:
Inpixon, Nadir Ali, Kareem M. Irfan and others
Busby v. Inpixon et al
as 3:2023cv04249
Plaintiff:
Daniel Busby
Defendant:
Inpixon, Nadir Ali, Kareem M. Irfan and others
Rossi et al v. Purvis et al
as 5:2023cv04148
Plaintiff:
Edward Rossi and StormQuant, Inc.
Defendant:
Reuben Timothy Purvis, III, Purvis Trust Dated July 6, 2006, Heather Purvis and others
Layer Zero et al v. Pollen Mobile LLC et al
as 3:2023cv04023
Plaintiff:
Layer Zero and David Hudson
Defendant:
Pollen Mobile LLC, Pronto.ai Inc., Anthony Levandowski and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
BaoNgoc T. Vo v. Thomas M. Seibel et al
as 4:2023cv03895
Plaintiff:
BaoNgoc T. Vo
Defendant:
C3.ai, Inc., Thomas M. Seibel, Patricia A. House and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
