US District Court for the Northern District of California Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 17,424
Chappell v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv02019
Plaintiff:
Harold Chappell
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hammer v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv02003
Plaintiff:
DeVon Hammer
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Whatley v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv02004
Plaintiff:
Samuel Whatley
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gin v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv02010
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Gin
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01983
Plaintiff:
Maria Elena Rodriguez
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Facebook Payments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
O. et al v. Meta Platforms Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01989
Plaintiff:
S. O. and J. O.
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc., Instagram, LLC, Siculus, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Rodee v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01954
Plaintiff:
Mary Rodee
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Facebook Payments, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Talley et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv01876
Plaintiff:
Seth Talley and Lyda Talley
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hartman v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv01894
Plaintiff:
Carlton Hartman
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ortego v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01914
Plaintiff:
Brandon Ortego
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
