U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Cases 1 - 10 of 53,091
Chaar v. New York University College of Dentistry
as 24-1169
Plaintiff:
Dr. EDGARD EL CHAAR
Defendant:
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY
Travelers Indemnity Company v. AXIS Insurance Company
as 24-1168
Plaintiff:
TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY
Defendant:
AXIS INSURANCE COMPANY
Brown v. Montefiore Medical Center
as 24-1171
Plaintiff:
KAREEM BROWN
Defendant:
MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER
Auclair v. Corning Incorporated
as 24-1172
Plaintiff:
BRIAN AUCLAIR
Not Yet Classified:
CORNING INCORPORATED, CORNING PROPERTY MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and LAYNE CHRISTENSEN COMPANY
Scully v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as 24-1173
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY WACHTEL, TONG B. TRAN and ALISON SCULLY, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant:
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and MORGAN STANLEY
The Bronx Freedom Fund v. City of New York
as 24-1174
Plaintiff:
THE BRONX FREEDOM FUND, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, JUSTIN BARRY, New York City Criminal Court Chief Clerk, WILLIAM KALISH, Bronx County Borough Chief Clerk and others
Brown v. Suffolk County Police Department
as 24-1175
Plaintiff:
ADRIENNE BROWN, HENRY MULLIGAN, (incarcerated) and CHRISPHER BRANDL
Defendant:
SUFFOLK COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, "OFFICERS & SGT. "ETC", PHILLIPS OSTEN, Officer and others
VR Global Partners, L.P. v. Petroleos De Venezuela S.A.
as 24-1176
Plaintiff:
VR GLOBAL PARTNERS, L.P.
Defendant:
PETROLEOS DE VENEZUELA S.A., PDVSA PETROLEO, S.A. and PDV HOLDING, INC.
Florio v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
as 24-1177
Plaintiff:
SYED ZAHEER and TRAVIS FLORIO, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Defendant:
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. and MORGAN STANLEY
Chowdhury v. Garland
as 24-1170
Petitioner:
JAHANGIR CHOWDHURY
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
