District of Delaware Prisoner Petitions Cases

Cases filed

Cases 31 - 40 of 2,339
Arias et al v. Danberg et al
as 1:2015cv00197
Plaintiff: Melchor Arias , Marie Cristina Kurcan
Defendant: Carl Danberg, Karl Hines, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Samans v. Pierce et al
as 1:2015cv00171
Plaintiff: Ryan S. Samans
Defendant: David Pierce, Bruce Burton
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. State of Delaware et al
as 1:2015cv00166
Petitioner: Cortez T. Harmon
Respondent: State of Delaware, Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Paskins v. Pierce et al
as 1:2015cv00147
Petitioner: Daniel M. Paskins, Jr.
Respondent: David Pierce, Robert Coupe, Matt Denn
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Pierce et al
as 1:2015cv00140
Petitioner: John C. Johnson
Respondent: David Pierce, Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Kennedy et al
as 1:2015cv00135
Plaintiff: Javon D. Jackson
Defendant: Kennedy, John Doe
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooke v. Coupe et al
as 1:2015cv00130
Petitioner: James E. Cooke, Jr.
Respondent: Robert M. Coupe, David Pierce
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Samans v. Pennell et al
as 1:2015cv00104
Plaintiff: Ryan S. Samans
Defendant: Frank Pennell, David Pierce, Craig Brumbaugh
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Newton v. USA
as 1:2015cv00067
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Beverly Newton
Cause Of Action: Motion to Vacate Sentence
Chapman v. Davis et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00041
Plaintiff: Jonath K Chapman, Sr
Defendant: Eric Davis, Krista Griffith, C.d. McKay and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Rights
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.