US District Court for the District of Columbia Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 112
MARTINEZ v. WRSH WASHINGTON, LLC
as 1:2010cv01523
Plaintiff:
JOSE ERNESTO MARTINEZ
Defendant:
WRSH WASHINGTON, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
MARTINEZ v. LHCW HOTEL HOLDING (2002), LLC
as 1:2010cv01525
Plaintiff:
JOSE ERNESTO MARTINEZ
Defendant:
LHCW HOTEL HOLDING (2002), LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CHAHIL v. EPISCOPAL CHURCH HOME FRIENDSHIP, INC.
as 1:2010cv00418
Plaintiff:
PARSHOTAM CHAHIL
Defendant:
EPISCOPAL CHURCH HOME FRIENDSHIP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
EQUAL RIGHTS CENTER v. PARADIGM DEVELOPMENT COMPANY et al
as 1:2009cv01665
Plaintiff:
EQUAL RIGHTS CENTER
Defendant:
PARADIGM DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, PARADIGM MANAGEMENT COMPANY and PARADIGM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
MARTINEZ v. CLPF - CC PAVILION, L.P.
as 1:2009cv01259
Plaintiff:
JOSE ERNESTO MARTINEZ
Defendant:
CLPF - CC PAVILION, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
MARTINEZ v. WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
as 1:2009cv01256
Plaintiff:
JOSE ERNESTO MARTINEZ
Defendant:
WASHINGTON REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
MARTINEZ v. STREET RETAIL, INC.,
as 1:2009cv01255
Plaintiff:
JOSE ERNESTO MARTINEZ
Defendant:
STREET RETAIL, INC.,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
MARTINEZ v. RIDENOUR
as 1:2009cv01257
Plaintiff:
JOSE ERNESTO MARTINEZ
Defendant:
JOHN W. RIDENOUR, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188 Americans With Disabilities Act
PARKER v. DANIELS et al
as 1:2009cv00810
Plaintiff:
AQUILLA PARKER
Defendant:
MARVIN DANIELS and DIANITA CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TUCKER v. 3511 - 13TH STREET NW RESIDENCES, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv00505
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
