US District Court for the Northern District of Florida Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,843
IMGRAM v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Lindsay Ingram
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
RIVERS v. OMALLEY
as 4:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
JAMES RIVERS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
FLETCHER v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
JAMES L FLETCHER
Defendant:
MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
COE v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE ROSE COE
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
FUSCELLA v. KIJAKAZI
as 3:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
MASHEIGHLA FUSCELLA
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI and MARTIN J OMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
CHAPMAN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA LYNN CHAPMAN
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
MICKLE v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2023cv24764
Plaintiff:
THOMAS CHARLES MICKLE
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
YELVERTON v. KIJAKAZI
as 3:2023cv24748
Plaintiff:
MARCUS RAY YELVERTON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
ENGSTROM v. KIJAKAZI
as 4:2023cv00486
Plaintiff:
Michael Shawn Engstrom
Defendant:
Secretary Social Security and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
HILL v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2023cv00267
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Plaintiff:
KAREN CLAIRE HILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
