US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia Labor Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 255
Brown v. American Moving & Storage, LLC et al
as 4:2018cv00009
Plaintiff:
Charmayne Brown
Defendant:
American Moving & Storage, LLC , Kevin Allen and Ralph McBride
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 b
Beasley v. Spek Cloud, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00007
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brandt Beasley
Defendant:
Spek Cloud, Inc. and Stephen A. Spivey, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Quirino et al v. Saucedo et al
as 2:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
Christian Murillo Quirino , Ricardo Hernandez Quintero , Osvaldo Ruvacalba Haros and others
Defendant:
Francisco Saucedo and The Pine Straw Man, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Eigenberger et al v. Tokyo Statesboro GA, LLC et al
as 6:2017cv00160
Plaintiff:
Kyra Eigenberger and Danielle Tuck
Defendant:
Tokyo Statesboro GA, LLC and Ling Lin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Diddell v. Miracle Home Care, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00142
Plaintiff:
Dellaney Diddell
Defendant:
Miracle Home Care, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gonzalez et al v. Shiloh Berry Farm, Inc. et al
as 5:2017cv00149
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Gonzalez Gonzalez , Giezi Gonzalez Gonzalez , Damian Baas Marquez and others
Defendant:
Shiloh Berry Farm, Inc. and Wesley Shane Wade
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Brown v. Pontus LLC et al
as 4:2017cv00202
Plaintiff:
Dixie Brown
Defendant:
Pontus LLC and Ivaylo Dimitrov
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Marat v. Eagle Applied Sciences, LLC
as 2:2017cv00102
Plaintiff:
Patti L. Marat
Defendant:
Eagle Applied Sciences, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stuart et al
as 1:2017cv00107
Plaintiff:
Frank Stuart , Jason Adams , Michael Barnes and others
Defendant:
Augusta-Richmond County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Lee v. City of Walthourville
as 4:2017cv00139
Plaintiff:
Latarshia Lee
Defendant:
City of Walthourville
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 b
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
