Georgia Contract Cases

Miller Act Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 247
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Galloway-Bell Inc. v. Crowder Industrial Construction, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Galloway-Bell Inc.
Defendant: Crowder Industrial Construction, LLC, Alberici-Mortenson, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States on behalf of and for the use and benefit of Gold Mechanical Inc. v. Travelers Casualty Surety Company of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00005
Plaintiff: United States on behalf of and for the use and benefit of Gold Mechanical Inc.
Defendant: Travelers Casualty Surety Company of America, Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company and Gilbane Federal Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America v. Drace Construction Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv05126
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Drace Construction Corp. and U.S. Specialty Insurance Company
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the use and benefit of Blankenship Group, Inc. et al v. Poettker Construction Company et al
as 4:2023cv00217
Counter Defendant: United States of America for the use and benefit of Blankenship Group, Inc.
Plaintiff: Blankenship Group, Inc.
Defendant: Poettker Construction Company, Zodiac-Poettker HBZ Joint Venture II, LLC and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. Sand Point Services, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00208
Plaintiff: United States of America for the use and benefit of QUALITY GLASS COMPANY, INC.
Defendant: Sand Point Services, LLC, Fidelity And Deposit Company Of Maryland and Zurich American Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Miller Act
ACW INC v. ASHFORD LEEBCOR ENTERPRISES LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00133
Plaintiff: A.C.W. Inc. and ACW INC
Defendant: Ashford Leebcor Enterprises, LLC, The Cincinnati Insurance Company, ASHFORD LEEBCOR ENTERPRISES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
BOOTH PLUMBING CO INC. v. ASHFORD LEEBCOR ENTERPRISES INC et al
as 4:2023cv00121
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use of Booth Plumbing Co., Inc. and BOOTH PLUMBING CO INC
Defendant: Ashford Leebcor Enterprises, LLC, The Cincinnati Insurance Company, ASHFORD LEEBCOR ENTERPRISES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States Of America et al v. F.D. Thomas, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00067
Plaintiff: United States Of America and Champion Painting Specialty Services Corporation
Defendant: F.D. Thomas, Inc., Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Travelers Casualty And Surety Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
The United States of America for the use and benefit of Prolift Rigging Company, LLC v. Crane Technologies Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00018
Plaintiff: The United States of America for the use and benefit of Prolift Rigging Company, LLC
Defendant: Crane Technologies Group, Inc. and NGM Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the use of Goff Electric, Inc. et al v. The DefComm Group, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00005
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the use of Goff Electric, Inc. and Goff Electric, Inc.
Defendant: The DefComm Group, LLC, Reuben Mark Ward, UNAMI, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270 Miller Act
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?