District of Georgia Torts - Property Cases

Other Fraud Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 782
Wallace v. Weems
as 1:2015cv01615
Plaintiff: Barbara L. Wallace
Defendant: Vernetta Weems
iBuddy Club Inc. v. Perry et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00063
Plaintiff: iBuddy Club Inc.
Defendant: Ronald Perry, Integrity Giving LLC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity of citizenship
Fisher v. Educational Credit Management Corporation
as 1:2015cv01035
Plaintiff: Gerald Alexander Fisher
Defendant: Educational Credit Management Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Fraud
Tyler v. Child Support Recovery Service, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00948
Plaintiff: Michael D. Tyler
Defendant: Child Support Recovery Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Action to enforce child support obligations
PRUITTHEALTH-MOULTRIE LLC v. MCHUGH FULLER LAW GROUP PPLC
as 7:2015cv00048
Plaintiff: PRUITTHEALTH-MOULTRIE LLC
Defendant: MCHUGH FULLER LAW GROUP PPLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
PARKER v. NVIDIA CORPORATION
as 1:2015cv00062
Plaintiff: PATRICK E PARKER
Defendant: NVIDIA CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Franklin v. Facebook, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00655
Plaintiff: Ricky R. Franklin
Defendant: Facebook, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Ramos v. Farahany et al
as 1:2015cv00642
Plaintiff: Luis Ramos
Defendant: Amanda Farahany, Barrett & Farahany, LLC
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question
WALKER-GOGGINS v. GEORGIA POWER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2015cv00029
Plaintiff: ANNETTE WALKER-GOGGINS
Defendant: GEORGIA POWER
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Tort Action
Zamani v. Sachar et al
as 1:2015cv00586
Plaintiff: Morteza Zamani
Defendant: Chirjeer Sachar, Dhiraj Dutta , Surinder Dutta and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Fraud
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.