US District Court for the District of Hawaii Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 103
S. et al v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2009cv00569
Plaintiff:
A. S. and Brian Shaughnessy
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Linda Lingle, Lilian Koller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kokua Legal Services, Inc. et al v. Hoshino et al
as 1:2009cv00516
Plaintiff:
Kokua Legal Services, Inc. and Camelia Johnson
Defendant:
Kenneth Hoshino and Doris Hoshino
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Shaughnessy v. Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00177
Plaintiff:
Brian Shaughnessy
Defendant:
Alexander & Baldwin, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Kokua Legal Services, Inc. et al v. Bustamante
as 1:2009cv00148
Plaintiff:
Kokua Legal Services, Inc. and Camelia Johnson
Defendant:
Chris Bustamante
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kokua Legal Services, Inc. et al v. Wong Family Trust
as 1:2009cv00147
Plaintiff:
Kokua Legal Services, Inc. and Camelia Johnson
Defendant:
Wong Family Trust
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Parr v. Soul De Cuba Honolulu LLC
as 1:2009cv00089
Plaintiff:
Eric Parr
Defendant:
Soul De Cuba Honolulu LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Marczak v. Club Oriental, Inc.
as 1:2009cv00091
Plaintiff:
Dale Marczak
Defendant:
Club Oriental, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Shaughnessy v. KC Rainbow Development Corporation, LLC
as 1:2009cv00051
Plaintiff:
Brian Shaughnessy
Defendant:
KC Rainbow Development Corporation, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Parr v. Lucky Star Corp.
as 1:2009cv00010
Plaintiff:
Eric Parr
Defendant:
Lucky Star Corp.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McMillon et al v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2008cv00578
Plaintiff:
Hazel McMillon, Hazel McMillon, Hazel McMillon and others
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Hawaii Public Housing Authority and Realty Laua LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
