US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 194
Vest et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2011cv00206
Plaintiff:
Donnie J Vest , Richard N Howard , Toby C Chambers and others
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Robinson et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2010cv01046
Plaintiff:
Willie Robinson , Flazell Redfield , Richard Ross and others
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Maroney v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00961
Plaintiff:
Bernard R. Maroney
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
York v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
as 3:2010cv00854
Plaintiff:
Steven L. York
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Payne v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2010cv00408
Plaintiff:
Rodney J. Payne
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Tidwell v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 3:2010cv00373
Plaintiff:
George Tidwell
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Seabaugh v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2010cv00268
Plaintiff:
Bryon L. Seabaugh
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Allen et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 3:2010cv00186
Plaintiff:
Irvin Allen , Ernest Brandon , Milton O'Neil and others
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Denzik v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 3:2010cv00116
Plaintiff:
Curtis M. Denzik
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Railway Labor Act
Gallatin v. Illinois Central Railroad Company
as 3:2010cv00013
Plaintiff:
Stephen Gallatin
Defendant:
Illinois Central Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
