US District Court for the Southern District of Illinois Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,894
Woodard v. Illinois
as 3:2024cv01251
Petitioner:
Anthony Thomas Dewayne Woodard and Anthony D Woodard
Defendant:
People of the State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Seger v. People of the State et al
as 3:2024cv01226
Petitioner:
Logan S. Seger
Respondent:
People of the State, Department of Human Services and State of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Graham v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01224
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01225
Petitioner:
Ronald Jermaine Jackson
Respondent:
T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Marquez v. USA
as 3:2024cv01218
Petitioner:
Oscar Marquez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Luedtke v. Lilliard
as 3:2024cv01197
Petitioner:
James Luedtke
Respondent:
T Lilliard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jackson v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01151
Petitioner:
Ronald Jermaine Jackson
Defendant:
T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Wilson v. Wills
as 3:2024cv01145
Petitioner:
Blake D Wilson
Defendant:
Wills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Graham v. Lillard
as 3:2024cv01110
Petitioner:
William Charles Graham
Respondent:
T. Lillard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Banana v. Brookhart
as 3:2024cv01109
Petitioner:
Donald Banana
Defendant:
Dee Dee Brookhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
