US District Court for the Northern District of Indiana Contract Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,735
Lee v. Thor Motor Coach Inc
as 3:2024cv00252
Defendant:
Valerie Kay Lee and Thor Motor Coach Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Jenkins v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
Audra Jenkins
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach, Inc. and Camping World RV Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Van Wyen v. Thor Motor Coach Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
Mark William VanWyen
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach Inc and Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Behrens v. Forest River, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Raymond E Behrens
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc. and General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
TimePayment Corp. v. All Pieces Fit, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
TimePayment Corp.
Defendant:
All Pieces Fit Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Webster v. Bradford-Scott Data, LLC
as 1:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Anthony Webster
Defendant:
Bradford-Scott Data, LLC d/b/a Sharetec
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Alfafara v. Forest River, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00224
Plaintiff:
Gerald J. Alafara
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Fowler et al v. Forest River, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00225
Plaintiff:
Peter L. Fowler and Kimberly Amanda Fowler
Defendant:
Forest River, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Barnes et al v. Keystone RV Company
as 3:2024cv00223
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Barnes and Virgie Ann Barnes
Defendant:
Keystone RV Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Riben Marine, Inc. v. Thor Motor Coach, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
Riben Marine, Inc.
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
