Kentucky Contract Cases

Stockholders Suits Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Fox et al v. Lovas et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00219
Plaintiff: Cindy L. Fox and Sandra Kay Bottoms
Defendant: Louis J. Lovas , Larry J. McManus , Matthew D. Partain and others
Counter_claimant: Leslie A. Hibner and Steven W. Hibner
Counter_defendant: Sandra Kay Bottoms and Cindy L. Fox
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Bowlin Construction Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Griffin et al
as 2:2010cv00275
Plaintiff: Bowlin Construction Enterprises, Inc. and Bowlin Group, LLC
Defendant: Johnny Griffin and Donald Tidwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Huston v. Yarmuth et al
as 3:2010cv00691
Plaintiff: Blaze B. Huston
Defendant: William B. Yarmuth, Steven B. Bing, Donald G. McClinton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Infinity Business Group, Inc. v. Cordell et al
as 6:2009cv00294
Plaintiff: Infinity Business Group, Inc.
Defendant: Wade B. Cordell, Wade B. Cordell, Bradshaw O. Cordell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Type: Contract None
Reinitz v. Cox Interior, Inc. et al
as 4:2008cv00014
Plaintiff: Arno Fred Reinitz
Defendant: Cox Interior, Inc., Barry G. Cox, Lanny B. Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Tritschler et al v. Haire We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2007cv00437
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Heer v. Price
as 1:2006cv00114
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Irwin v. Gemunder et al
as 2:2006cv00062
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Isaka Investments, Ltd. v. Xino Corporation et al
as 3:2005cv00795
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hibberd v. Tempur-Pedic International, Inc. et al
as 5:2005cv00455
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?