US District Court for the District of Maine Other Statutes Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 229
MAINE RSA #1 INC v. ALBION, TOWN OF
as 1:2010cv00279
Plaintiff:
MAINE RSA #1 INC
Defendant:
ALBION, TOWN OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EATON v. MOCEUS et al
as 1:2010cv00274
Plaintiff:
RICHARD S EATON
Defendant:
ELAINE MOCEUS and AGRICULTURE, US DEPT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
OAKES v. MOSS
as 2:2010cv00246
Plaintiff:
DAVID J OAKES
Defendant:
JENNIFER L MOSS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SNOW v. U S POSTAL SERVICE
as 1:2010cv00174
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH SNOW
Defendant:
U S POSTAL SERVICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
UNITED STATES MARINE INC et al v. HODGDON YACHTS INC et al
as 2:2010cv00143
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES MARINE INC and VT HALTER MARINE INC
Defendant:
HODGDON YACHTS INC, HODGDON DEFENSE COMPOSITES LLC and DONALD L BLOUNT AND ASSOCIATES INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, MAINE DEPT v. HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, US DEPT et al
as 1:2010cv00077
Plaintiff:
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, MAINE DEPT
Defendant:
HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, US DEPT, CENTERS FOR MEDICARE AND MEDICAID SERVICES, HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, US SECRETARY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
NICOLSON v. PAPPALARADO
as 2:2009cv00541
Petitioner:
LUCAS NICOLSON
Respondent:
ERICA PAPPALARDO
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
TANG v. PHILIP MORRIS USA INC
as 1:2009cv00431
Plaintiff:
BRYANT TANG
Defendant:
PHILIP MORRIS USA INC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MILLAY v. SURRY SCHOOL DEPARTMENT
as 1:2009cv00411
Plaintiff:
JOANNE M MILLAY
Defendant:
SURRY SCHOOL DEPARTMENT , JAMES BOOTHBY , OMAR NORTON and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
PATTERSON et al v. ORONO SCHOOL DEPARTMENT
as 1:2009cv00405
Plaintiff:
HOWARD PATTERSON and AGNES PATTERSON
Defendant:
ORONO SCHOOL DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
