Maine Labor Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 98
VUCHKOV v. MASTER SERVICES et al
as 2:2010cv00472
Plaintiff:
VLADIMIR VUCHKOV
Defendant:
MASTER SERVICES and PETKO G DELEV
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
JOHNSON et al v. VCG HOLDING CORPORATION
as 2:2010cv00442
Plaintiff:
ERNEST E JOHNSON, III and BRIAN S PRINDLE
Defendant:
VCG HOLDING CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
ESTES v. PINELAND FARMS INC
as 2:2010cv00347
Plaintiff:
MISSI ESTES
Defendant:
PINELAND FARMS INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
RODNEY v. COMPASS FACILITY SERVICES INC
as 2:2010cv00222
Plaintiff:
JOHN J RODNEY
Defendant:
COMPASS FACILITY SERVICES INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
LABOR, US SECRETARY v. CRYSTAL CLEAR COMMUNICATIONS et al
as 1:2010cv00127
Plaintiff:
LABOR, US SECRETARY
Defendant:
CRYSTAL CLEAR COMMUNICATIONS and JOSEPH A TRICE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
PINKHAM v. TWAM INC, et al
as 1:2010cv00016
Plaintiff:
EDWARD PINKHAM
Defendant:
TWAM INC and FORCE MANUFACTURING INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
FOLEY et al v. FRONT ROOM LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00007
Plaintiff:
COLLEEN FOLEY , TORY BRIDGMAN , SHAWN J LITOURNEAU and others
Defendant:
FRONT ROOM LLC and HARDING SMITH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
CHEN et al v. SUPER GREAT WALL BUFFET INC et al
as 2:2009cv00397
Plaintiff:
YAN Q CHEN , DAN G LIN , WEI H WANG and others
Defendant:
SUPER GREAT WALL BUFFET INC , REN QI CHEN , SIOW WOOI CHANG and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
CALABRESE v. LINCOLN et al
as 2:2009cv00381
Plaintiff:
EARLENE CALABRESE
Defendant:
RUTH LINCOLN and ROBIN LINCOLN
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCCORMICK et al v. FESTIVA DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC et al
as 2:2009cv00365
Plaintiff:
ALISON MCCORMICK , SEAN FOLEY , TAMRA PHILBROOK and others
Defendant:
FESTIVA DEVELOPMENT GROUP LLC and RANGELEY LAKE RESORT DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
