Mississippi Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,473
Hoover v. Howe
as 4:2024cv00047
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Hoover, Jr.
Defendant:
David Howe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Kinchen v. Panther II Transportation, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Kimberley Kinchen
Defendant:
Panther II Transportation, Inc. doing business as Panther Premium Logistics, Cedric Brown and Fictitious Defendants A-Z
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Rawls v. The Standard Fire Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Jason Rawls
Defendant:
The Standard Fire Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Canoy v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
Connie Canoy
Defendant:
United States of America and Gwendolyn Durr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cole et al v. Watkins
as 3:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Robert Cole, Jr. and Patricia Cole
Defendant:
Barbara A. Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Cole v. The United States of America
as 1:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Lynntorise Cole
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 U.S. as a Defendant (formerly Medical Malpractice)
Myles v. Bazemore
as 5:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Latricia D. Myles
Defendant:
Shawn S. Bazemore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Horner v. Iris Trucking et al
as 3:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
James Grey Horner
Defendant:
Iris Trucking and John Doe A-X
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Keller et al v. Newsom
as 3:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Harold Keller and Deborah Keller
Defendant:
John Newsom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Baker v. Poe
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Henry L. Baker, Jr.
Defendant:
Brian S. Poe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
