US District Court for the Southern District of New York Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 23,013
Reeder v. Correction Officer Jane Doe et al
as 1:2024cv03127
Plaintiff:
Raszell Reeder
Defendant:
Correction Officer "Jane Doe", Correction Officer "John Doe", K. Mathews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fredricks v. Comstock
as 1:2024cv03135
Petitioner:
Nigel Fredricks
Respondent:
Comstock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garrison v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv03121
Plaintiff:
Kevin Garrison
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Holmes v. Torres et al
as 1:2024cv03062
Plaintiff:
Alexander Holmes
Defendant:
C.O. MS. Torres, Z. Jordan, D. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mazur v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv02963
Petitioner:
Michael Mazur
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02866
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Boykin v. County Of Westchester et al
as 7:2024cv02865
Defendant:
Jermaine Boykin, County Of Westchester, Lemar Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
