Ohio Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 4,984
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv02008
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv02011
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv02009
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
LSV Entertainment, LLC v. Barber et al
as 2:2024cv01867
Plaintiff:
LSV Entertainment, LLC
Defendant:
Eddie Barber, Janetta Boyce-Warren, Bobby Glover and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Shenzhen Yihong Technology Co., Ltd. v. InterDesign, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
Shenzhen Yihong Technology Co., Ltd. doing business as Vtopmart
Defendant:
InterDesign, Inc. doing business as iDesign
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Sparkle International, Inc. v. Earll et al.
as 1:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
Sparkle International, Inc.
Defendant:
Christopher L. Earll, Jeffrey S. Schrader and Cutting Edge Restoration, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
