Eastern District of Oklahoma Social Security Cases

Disability Insurance Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed

Cases 1 - 10 of 645
Collins v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2015cv00188
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sinyard v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2015cv00186
Plaintiff: Kenneth E. Sinyard
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Pitts v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2015cv00179
Plaintiff: Lateresa Gail Pitts
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Runge v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2015cv00168
Plaintiff: Patricia Anne Runge
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Wilkerson v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2015cv00167
Plaintiff: Skylor Georgeann Wilkerson
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Woods v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2015cv00165
Plaintiff: Gary D. Woods
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Self v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2015cv00160
Plaintiff: Clendon Joe Self
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Blevins v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2015cv00159
Plaintiff: Earl Lee Blevins
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Carlsen v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2015cv00153
Plaintiff: Eric A. Carlsen
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Baldridge v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2015cv00152
Plaintiff: John Allen Baldridge
Defendant: Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
1 2 3 4 5 Next

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets were retrieved from PACER, and should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.