US District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma Labor Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Rockey v. High Mountain Oil Services, LLC et al
as 6:2013cv00187
Plaintiff:
Melvin Rockey
Defendant:
High Mountain Oil Services, LLC and Mark McAlister
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Mode et al v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 6:2013cv00069
Plaintiff:
Joshua Mode , Robert Johnston , Rocky Makovy and others
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109 Employee Protections
Jones v. Creoks Mental Health Services
as 6:2012cv00332
Plaintiff:
Carlen D. Jones
Defendant:
Creoks Mental Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Silva v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 6:2012cv00268
Plaintiff:
Jose Juan Silva
Defendant:
Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20109
McClellan v. Skytech Enterprises, LTD et al
as 6:2012cv00202
Plaintiff:
John McClellan, Jr.
Defendant:
Skytech Enterprises, LTD , Asberry Rakestraw and Anna Rakestraw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Legg v. Corrections Corporation of America, Inc.
as 6:2011cv00435
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Legg
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hopper v. Sooner Home Health Services, Inc.
as 6:2010cv00454
Plaintiff:
Sherry R. Hopper
Defendant:
Sooner Home Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Dodd v. Tahlequah Public Works Authority et al
as 6:2010cv00397
Plaintiff:
Chris Allen Dodd
Defendant:
Tahlequah Public Works Authority and Stanley K. Day
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Worley v. Vilsack
as 6:2010cv00210
Plaintiff:
Jacob Worley
Defendant:
Thomas J. Vilsack
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hopson v. Selrahc, Limited Partnership et al
as 6:2010cv00155
Plaintiff:
Teresa Hopson
Defendant:
Selrahc, Limited Partnership and Charles D. Roye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
