US District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 58
Anderson v. Lowes Home Centers LLC
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Anderson
Defendant:
Lowes Home Centers LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Pursuant to the Family Leave Act
Bolen v. MHM Support Services et al
as 5:2023cv01083
Plaintiff:
Kristy Bolen
Defendant:
MHM Support Services and Chris Carter
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Pursuant to the Family Leave Act
Cohagen v. Elk City Public School
as 5:2023cv00433
Plaintiff:
Alicia Cohagen
Defendant:
Elk City Public School
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Daggs v. Oklahoma Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2022cv00905
Plaintiff:
Jade Daggs
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Public Safety, Charles Kerr, Ronnie Hampton and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Riley v. The GoodYear Tire and Rubber Company
as 5:2022cv00357
Plaintiff:
Tasha Riley
Defendant:
Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Pursuant to the Family Leave Act
Coker v. SSM Health Bone and Joint et al
as 5:2022cv00311
Plaintiff:
Sarah Coker
Defendant:
SSM Health Bone and Joint, St Anthonys Hospital and Cheryl McConnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Allen v. Clean Uniform Co
as 5:2022cv00244
Plaintiff:
George Allen
Defendant:
Clean Uniform Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Six v. American Fidelity Corporation
as 5:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Brianne Six
Defendant:
American Fidelity Corporation and American Fidelity Assurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Pursuant to the Family Leave Act
Lynn v. DCP Midstream LP
as 5:2021cv00658
Plaintiff:
Tom Lynn
Defendant:
DCP Midstream LP and DCP Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Zamora v. Air Evac EMS Inc
as 5:2021cv00383
Plaintiff:
Tommy Zamora
Defendant:
Air Evac EMS Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
