US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Contract Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 7,085
Fordyce v. Keller Williams Realty, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01342
Plaintiff:
Edward Fordyce
Defendant:
Keller Williams Realty, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
R&P TECHNOLOGIES INC v. HAYCOX
as 2:2024cv01311
Plaintiff:
R&P TECHNOLOGIES INC
Defendant:
TAYLOR HAYCOX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Misappropriation of Trade Secrets
WESCOTT v. RAJAN
as 2:2024cv01339
Plaintiff:
CARL A WESCOTT
Defendant:
MR. RAJA B. RAJAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SUREFIRE HEALTH BUCKS, LLC v. SHEPPARD
as 2:2024cv01272
Plaintiff:
SUREFIRE HEALTH BUCKS, LLC doing business as CAREBUILDERS AT HOME
Defendant:
EDWIN SHEPPARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
TEMPLE OF NIIJI TRUST v. HARRIS JR TRANSPORT LLC
as 2:2024cv01294
Plaintiff:
TEMPLE OF NIIJI TRUST
Defendant:
HARRIS JR TRANSPORT LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
SUREFILE HEALTH BUCKS, LLC D/B/A CAREBUILDERS AT HOME v. SHEPPARD
as 2:2024cv01270
Plaintiff:
SUREFILE HEALTH BUCKS, LLC D/B/A CAREBUILDERS AT HOME
Defendant:
EDWIN SHEPPARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
ZUCKERMAN HONICKMAN, LLC v. TEARIOT, LLC
as 2:2024cv01285
Plaintiff:
ZUCKERMAN HONICKMAN, LLC
Defendant:
TEARIOT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
GEIS REALTY GROUP, INC. v. AMPC REAL ESTATE LLC
as 2:2024cv01259
Plaintiff:
GEIS REALTY GROUP, INC.
Defendant:
AMPC REAL ESTATE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FELDER v. CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE
as 2:2024cv01267
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Felder
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Curbio Inc. v. Buxton
as 2:2024cv01241
Plaintiff:
Curbio Inc.
Defendant:
Carol Buxton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
