US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Social Security Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 3,310
TALARICO v. KIJAKAZI
as 5:2023cv04436
Plaintiff:
NICOLE RENEE TALARICO
Defendant:
DR KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
DARING v. SOCIAL SECURITY SSDI
as 2:2023cv04357
Plaintiff:
STEVEN DARING
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY SSDI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
FRAZIER v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv04226
Plaintiff:
DONALD FRAZIER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
SEMMEL v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv04015
Plaintiff:
TRISTAN FISHER SEMMEL
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
DALTON v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv03861
Plaintiff:
SHIRORA DALTON OBO SJB and SHIKORA DALTON
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
MOYER v. KIJAKAZI
as 2:2023cv03837
Plaintiff:
ERIN NICOLE MOYER
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SAEZ v. Kilolo
as 2:2023cv03576
Plaintiff:
BLANCA SAEZ
Defendant:
Kijakazi Kilolo and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SMEDLEY v. COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 2:2023cv03517
Plaintiff:
HEATHER SMEDLEY
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Smedley v. Kijakazi,Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2023cv03517
Plaintiff:
Heather Smedley
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi,Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Sullivan v. Kijakazi,Acting Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2023cv03492
Plaintiff:
Tyler Sullivan
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi,Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
