US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Social Security Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 5,532
MASTROGIOVANNI v. O'MALLEY
as 5:2024cv01492
Plaintiff:
DAVID JOHN MASTROGIOVANNI
Defendant:
MARTIN OMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Henderson v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01463
Plaintiff:
Lafonda Charnetta Henderson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Coleman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01448
Plaintiff:
Rashida Coleman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
GONZALEZ v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv01442
Plaintiff:
ANGEL GONZALEZ
Defendant:
MARTIN J O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
GROFF v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv01450
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER GROFF
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
CARLISLE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2024cv01402
Plaintiff:
HARRY J. CARLISLE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
CARLISLE v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01402
Plaintiff:
HARRY J. CARLISLE
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bright v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01407
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bright
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Busch v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMIN. COMMISSIONER
as 2:2024cv01351
Plaintiff:
Alice Marie Busch
Defendant:
MARTIN J. OMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
TURHANAJ v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
ALBANO TURHANAJ
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
