US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Federal Tax Suits Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 31
PETERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2012cv02191
Petitioner:
JAY S. PETERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and LINDA HAWS
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
PENNSYLVANIA WIRE AND CABLE COMPANY, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
as 2:2012cv01020
Plaintiff:
PENNSYLVANIA WIRE AND CABLE COMPANY, INC.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
SONG v. THE UNITED STATES, et al
as 2:2012cv00310
Plaintiff:
EDWIN SONG and THU L
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES , INTERNAL REVENUE COMMISSIONER , STEPHEN J. MCCARRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
CATLETT v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2011cv07932
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
IRVIN HANNIS CATLETT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SONG et al v. THE UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2011cv07704
Petitioner:
EDWIN SONG and THU L.
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES, INTERNAL REVENUE COMMISSIONER, STEPHEN J. MCCARRICK and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. SIMON
as 2:2011cv07058
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and MILDRED PATRICK
Defendant:
TROY L. SIMON
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7604
GREEN v. THE UNITED STATES
as 2:2011cv06851
Plaintiff:
MARK ANDRES GREEN
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
PETERSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2011cv03064
Petitioner:
JAY S. PETERSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and LINDA HAWS
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
LEE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2009cv02785
Plaintiff:
MYONG HO LEE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
