Pennsylvania Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 173,010
DAMON v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.
as 2:2020cv60006
Plaintiff:
CLARA DAMON
Defendant:
KEENE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOUILLARD v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
as 2:2020cv60007
Defendant:
KEENE CORPORATION, CELOTEX CORPORATION, OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
JOAN DOUILLARD and JEAN DOUILLARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LYNCH v. OWENS ILLINOIS
as 2:2020cv60011
Plaintiff:
JAMES J. LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HORTIE v. OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC.
as 2:2020cv60010
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM CO, U.S. MINERAL PRODUCTS CO, CAREY CANADA INC and others
Plaintiff:
SYLVIO R. HORTIE and THERESA HORTIE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BONFELD v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
as 2:2020cv60001
Defendant:
CLAREMONT CO., INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY, CUMMINGS INSULATION CO., INC. and others
Plaintiff:
FAY BONFELD and LEO BONFELD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FISHER v. OWENS ILLINOIS INC.
as 2:2020cv60008
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA A. ROGERS and IRENE FISHER
Defendant:
OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC and KEENE CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BURGESS v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORP
as 2:2020cv60003
Defendant:
KEENE CORPORATION, OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES and others
Plaintiff:
HOWARD BURGESS and THERESA BURGESS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WICKER v. OWENS-ILLINOIS
as 2:2020cv60018
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP W. WICKER and MARIE WICKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAVANESI v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
as 2:2020cv60013
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RAVANESI and LUCY RAVANESI
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRADLEY v. DEFENDANT
as 2:2020cv60002
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH BRADLEY and KENNETH H. BRADLEY
Defendant:
KEENE CORPORATION and PITTSBURGH CORNING CORP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
