US District Court for the Northern District of Texas Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 3,150
Gower v. Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust et al
as 3:2024cv00851
Plaintiff:
Marva Gower
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Real Estate Business Trust, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Foley v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00819
Plaintiff:
Gerald Foley
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Bey v. Whitfield
as 3:2024cv00808
Plaintiff:
Queen Akhenaten II Montgomery Bey
Defendant:
Pamela Whitfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Lovetro v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00783
Plaintiff:
Michael Lovetro
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Wilson v. British Airways PLC
as 3:2024cv00791
Plaintiff:
Elias Wilson
Defendant:
British Airways PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
King v. Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
as 3:2024cv00798
Not Yet Classified:
Yolanda King
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bagley v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00770
Plaintiff:
Lacrista A Bagley
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Byrd v. Spurgin et al
as 4:2024cv00299
Defendant:
Minta Delyn Spurgin, Lynn Spurgin and Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Joe W. Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Collier v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00782
Plaintiff:
Rachel Collier
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Garrick et al v. TransAm Trucking Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00729
Plaintiff:
Levi Garrick and Ashley Angelle
Defendant:
TransAm Trucking, Inc. and Haytham Salah Abbas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
