US District Court for the Western District of Texas Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,967
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2023cv01556
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Ansys, Inc. v. Does 1 Through 210
as 6:2023cv00871
Plaintiff:
Ansys, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1 Through 210
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Price v. Moody Independent School District et al
as 6:2023cv00845
Plaintiff:
John Price
Defendant:
Moody Independent School District, Moody Athletic Booster Club, Andrew Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Frampton v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc
as 1:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
Meg Frampton
Defendant:
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Howarth v. Southern Painting, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01485
Plaintiff:
Morgan Howarth
Defendant:
Southern Painting, Inc., Scott Gross, Mark Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Gray et al v. Ganguly et al
as 5:2023cv01484
Plaintiff:
Dupree Gray and Ibis Applications, LLC
Defendant:
Abhishek Ganguly and Cyboticx, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2023cv01424
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2023cv01425
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2023cv01422
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 1:2023cv01421
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
