Utah Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 80
Whistler v. United States Forest Service et al
as 1:2007cv00082
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Whistler
Defendant:
United States Forest Service, Ogden Ranger District and FNU Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. .223 Caliber Colt AR-15 A2 Sporter 2 Rifle Serial Number SP339101 et al
as 1:2007cv00065
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
.223 Caliber Colt AR-15 A2 Sporter 2 Rifle Serial Number SP339101, .22 Caliber Remington 552 Speedmaster Rifle, .22 Caliber Reminton 552 Speedmaster Rifle Serial Number A1630324 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff
United States of America v. Real Property Located at Layton Utah 84040 et al
as 1:2007cv00006
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property Located at Layton Utah 84040, Real Property Located at South Weber Utah 84405, Real Property Located at Mountain Green Utah 84050 and others
Claimant:
Paul Gotay, John D. Ross, Susan G. Ross and others
Counter Claimant:
CCM Unlimited, Mark G. Ward, Courtney Ward and others
Counter Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
United States of America v. Universal Advertising et al
as 1:2006cv00152
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 FTC Franchise Rule
United States of America v. Dell Laptop Computer
as 2:2006cv00573
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2254 Civil Forfeiture
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. E Weber Canyon Road, Oakley, Utah et al
as 2:2005cv00520
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881 Forfeiture Property - Real Estate
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. Merrill Lynch Investment Account #Redacted7A97 et al
as 2:2005cv00516
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1355 Petition for Return of Property
USA v. Bank One Account, et al
as 2:2005cv00285
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 0881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
