Wisconsin Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 576
Boyer v. Cook Medical LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00386
Plaintiff:
Joanne K Boyer
Defendant:
Cook Medical LLC, Cook Incorporated, Cook Medical Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Neumaier, Howard v. Walinga, Inc et al
as 3:2021cv00150
Defendant:
Walinga USA, Inc., Walinga, Inc, Eaton Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Howard Neumaier and Riverport Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rewolinski v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00263
Plaintiff:
Scott Rewolinski
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Savetwith v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00264
Plaintiff:
Susan Savetwith
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Orlowski v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00262
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Plaintiff:
Michael Lawrence Orlowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitaker v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00266
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Plaintiff:
Tammy Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gretz v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00258
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc and C R Bard Inc
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Gretz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grzeca v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00260
Plaintiff:
John Grzeca
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crum v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv00134
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Terry G Crum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schmidt et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv00265
Plaintiff:
Lisa Schmidt and Andy Schmidt
Defendant:
C R Bard Inc and Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
