Howard v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Alabama Middle District Howard v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

Howard v. United States of America (INMATE 3)

Plaintiff:	Cedric Howard
Defendant:	United States of America
Case Number:	2:2007cv00354
Filed:	April 26, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office:	Montgomery Office
County:	XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge:	W. Harold Albritton
Presiding Judge:	Terry F. Moorer
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 11, 2007	Filing 14 ORDER granting 12 Motion for Reinstatement of Petitioner's Motion and Objection to Magistrate Judge Report and Recommendation; it is hereby ORDERED that this court's 10 Order and 11 Final Judgment, entered on 10/10/2007, are VACATED a nd SET ASIDE; The 13 Objection is OVERRULED and The 2 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (styled Motion for Reconsideration of Sentencing Court Decision at Sentencing Hearing) is DENIED, and this case is hereby DISMISSED; Final Judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge W. Harold Albritton III on 12/11/2007. (wcl, )
May 1, 2007	Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) be denied and this case be dismissed as further set out in order; Objections to R&R due by 5/14/2007. Signed by Judge Terry F. Moorer on 5/1/2007. (wcl, )

Date Filed

Document Text

December 11, 2007

Filing 14 ORDER granting 12 Motion for Reinstatement of Petitioner's Motion and Objection to Magistrate Judge Report and Recommendation; it is hereby ORDERED that this court's 10 Order and 11 Final Judgment, entered on 10/10/2007, are VACATED a nd SET ASIDE; The 13 Objection is OVERRULED and The 2 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED; it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (styled Motion for Reconsideration of Sentencing Court Decision at Sentencing Hearing) is DENIED, and this case is hereby DISMISSED; Final Judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge W. Harold Albritton III on 12/11/2007. (wcl, )

May 1, 2007

Filing 2 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS of the Magistrate Judge that the 1 Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) be denied and this case be dismissed as further set out in order; Objections to R&R due by 5/14/2007. Signed by Judge Terry F. Moorer on 5/1/2007. (wcl, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Howard v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cedric Howard
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: United States of America
Represented By:	Kent B. Brunson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?