Danny Lynn Electrical & Plumbing LLC et al v. Veolia ES Solid Waste Southeast, Inc. et al
| Kevin Potthoff |
| Veolia ES Solid Waste Southeast, Inc., Veolia ES Solid Waste, Veolia Environmental Services and Veolia Environmental Services North America Corporation |
| 2:2009cv00192 |
| March 6, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Montgomery Office |
| Barbour |
| Myron H. Thompson |
| Terry F. Moorer |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
445
OPINION AND ORDER that plaintiffs' 436 Objections are overruled and that the magistrate judge's 435 Order is affirmed as further set out in the opinion and order. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 5/4/2012. (dmn, )
|
|
Filing
435
OPINION AND ORDER directing as follows: (1) 401 SEALED MOTION for sanctions filed by the plaintiffs be and is hereby DENIED; (2) the 421 MOTION to Strike Exhibits "M" and "N" to plaintiffs' motion for sanctions filed by the defendants be and is hereby DENIED; (3) the 434 MOTION for Protective Order filed by the defendants be and is hereby DENIED as moot. Signed by Honorable Judge Terry F. Moorer on 3/9/12. (djy, )
|
|
Filing
413
ORDER that the 412 Motion for Extension of Time is denied as further set out in the order. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 1/4/2012. (dmn, )
|
|
Filing
371
ORDER: By 365 Order entered on 9/26/2011, this court granted the plaintiffs' 359 Motion to Dismiss and dismissed Jackson's Rocky Ridge Pharmacy, Inc. as a plaintiff. However, Jackson's Rocky Ridge Pharmacy, Inc. is also a counter-d efendant. It is therefore ORDERED that the parties SHOW CAUSE as to why Jackson's Rocky Ridge Pharmacy, Inc. should not also be dismissed and terminated as a counter-defendant. Show Cause Response due by 10/11/2011. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 10/3/2011. (dmn)
|
|
Filing
310
OPINION AND ORDER that defendants' 177 Motion to Dismiss is: (1) Granted as to the plaintiffs' RICO claims, as further set out in the order. (2) Denied as to the plaintiffs' breach-of-contract claim, as further set out in the order. (3) Granted in part and denied in part as to the plaintiffs' unjust-enrichment claim, as further set out in the order. The plaintiffs' request to amend their complaint again is denied. Signed by Honorable Judge Myron H. Thompson on 7/19/2011. (dmn)
|
|
Filing
160
OPINION AND ORDER that defendants' 123 MOTION to Dismiss is: (1) Granted as to plaintiffs' RICO claims, alleged pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 1962 et seq., but with leave to file an amended complaint, setting forth amended RICO claims, w ithin 14 days from the date of this order as further set out in the order. (2) Denied as to plaintiffs' breach-of-contract claim as further set out in the order. (3) Denied as to the unjust-enrichment claim. (4) Granted as to the spoliation claim as further set out in the order. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 12/9/2010. (dmn)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
