The Achievable, Inc. v. Hamm
Appellant: The Achievable, Inc.
Appellee: Daniel G. Hamm
Case Number: 2:2011cv00678
Filed: August 22, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Autauga
Presiding Judge: Mark E. Fuller
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying the 5 Motion to Strike; vacating the 11 Order suspending the briefing schedule. Signed by Honorable Judge Mark E. Fuller on 12/1/2011. (br, )
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The Achievable, Inc. v. Hamm
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: The Achievable, Inc.
Represented By: Charles Nichols Parnell, III
Represented By: Mark Louis Rosenberg
Represented By: Julian H Spirer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Daniel G. Hamm
Represented By: Donald Joseph Stewart
Represented By: Stephen Charles Olen
Represented By: Lucy Elizabeth Tufts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?