Desai v. Onity, Inc.(CONSENT)
Plaintiff: Kishor Desai
Defendant: Onity, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2013cv00312
Filed: May 7, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office: Montgomery Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: Wallace Capel
Nature of Suit: Prop. Damage Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Desai v. Onity, Inc.(CONSENT)
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Onity, Inc.
Represented By: Jeffrey P. Doss
Represented By: Rebecca Baden Chaney, F
Represented By: John Mann Johnson
Represented By: Scott Winkelman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kishor Desai
Represented By: David R Scott
Represented By: Blaine Celone Stevens
Represented By: Manish Hasmukh Patel
Represented By: John Mark Maddox
Represented By: Joseph P. Guglielmo
Represented By: Gregory Louis Davis
Represented By: Erin Green Comite
Represented By: Christopher M. Burke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?