Alabama Gas Corporation v. Gas Fitters Local Union No. 548 of the United Association, AFL-CIO-CLC

Justia Dockets & Filings Eleventh Circuit Alabama Middle District Alabama Gas Corporation v. Gas Fitters Local Union No. 548 of the United Association, AFL-CIO-CLC

Alabama Gas Corporation v. Gas Fitters Local Union No. 548 of the United Association, AFL-CIO-CLC

Plaintiff:	Alabama Gas Corporation
Defendant:	Gas Fitters Local Union No. 548 of the United Association, AFL-CIO-CLC
Case Number:	2:2013cv00580
Filed:	August 14, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office:	Montgomery Office
County:	Montgomery
Presiding Judge:	Susan Russ Walker
Presiding Judge:	William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit:	Labor: Labor/Mgt. Relations
Cause of Action:	29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 23, 2014	Filing 32 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that: (1) Local 548's Motion to Exclude Affidavit and Opinion of Carol S. Dodgen (Doc. # 20 ) is GRANTED; (2) Alagasco's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 14 ) is DENIED, and Alagasco's request for vacatur of the arbitration award is DENIED; (3) Local 548's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 16 ) is DENIED in part, with respect to its request for sanctions in the form of attorney's fees and expenses;(4) Local 548's Motion fo r Summary Judgment (Doc. # 16 ) is otherwise GRANTED, and Local 548's request for confirmation of the arbitration award is GRANTED; and(5) The arbitration award dated May 16, 2013, is CONFIRMED, as further set out. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 7/23/14. (scn, )

Date Filed

Document Text

July 23, 2014

Filing 32 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that: (1) Local 548's Motion to Exclude Affidavit and Opinion of Carol S. Dodgen (Doc. # 20 ) is GRANTED; (2) Alagasco's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 14 ) is DENIED, and Alagasco's request for vacatur of the arbitration award is DENIED; (3) Local 548's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 16 ) is DENIED in part, with respect to its request for sanctions in the form of attorney's fees and expenses;(4) Local 548's Motion fo r Summary Judgment (Doc. # 16 ) is otherwise GRANTED, and Local 548's request for confirmation of the arbitration award is GRANTED; and(5) The arbitration award dated May 16, 2013, is CONFIRMED, as further set out. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 7/23/14. (scn, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alabama Gas Corporation v. Gas Fitters Local Union No. 548 of the United Association, AFL-CIO-CLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alabama Gas Corporation
Represented By:	John William Hargrove
Represented By:	Anne Knox Averitt
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Gas Fitters Local Union No. 548 of the United Association, AFL-CIO-CLC
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?