Carruth v. Thomas (DEATH PENALTY)

Carruth v. Thomas (DEATH PENALTY)

Plaintiff:	Michael David Carruth
Defendant:	Kim T. Thomas
Case Number:	2:2014cv01107
Filed:	October 23, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama
Office:	Montgomery Office
County:	Montgomery
Presiding Judge:	William Keith Watkins
Nature of Suit:	Death Penalty
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
November 8, 2022	Filing 61 ORDER: Petitioner is under a sentence of death and is appealing the judgment dismissing his petition for habeas corpus relief (Doc. 49 ). Before the court is Petitioner's Application for a Certificate of Appealability (Doc. 51 ), which is c onstrued as a motion. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for a Certificate of Appealability (Doc. 51 ) is GRANTED as to the six issues listed above and otherwise is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 11/8/2022. Furnished Appeals Clerk. (dmn, )
September 20, 2022	Filing 48 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that Carruth's 34 amended petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing; An appropriate final judgment will follow. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 9/20/2022. (bes, ) (Main Document 48 replaced on 9/20/2022 to attach a corrected PDF document to remove highlighter that was previously included in error) (bes, ). Modified on 9/20/2022 (bes, ).

Date Filed

Document Text

November 8, 2022

Filing 61 ORDER: Petitioner is under a sentence of death and is appealing the judgment dismissing his petition for habeas corpus relief (Doc. 49 ). Before the court is Petitioner's Application for a Certificate of Appealability (Doc. 51 ), which is c onstrued as a motion. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for a Certificate of Appealability (Doc. 51 ) is GRANTED as to the six issues listed above and otherwise is DENIED. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 11/8/2022. Furnished Appeals Clerk. (dmn, )

September 20, 2022

Filing 48 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: it is ORDERED that Carruth's 34 amended petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing; An appropriate final judgment will follow. Signed by Honorable Judge William Keith Watkins on 9/20/2022. (bes, ) (Main Document 48 replaced on 9/20/2022 to attach a corrected PDF document to remove highlighter that was previously included in error) (bes, ). Modified on 9/20/2022 (bes, ).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carruth v. Thomas (DEATH PENALTY)
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael David Carruth
Represented By:	Randall S. Susskind
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Kim T. Thomas
Represented By:	Thomas R. Govan, Jr.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?