Sophocleus, et al v. Dept. Transportation, et al

Case Number: 3:2000cv00652
Filed: May 19, 2000
Court: Alabama Middle District Court
Office: Opelika Office
Referring Judge: Wallace Capel
Presiding Judge: Myron H. Thompson
Nature of Suit: Condemnation
Cause of Action: 28:1358 Land Condemnation
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 12, 2009 141 Opinion or Order of the Court OPINION. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 3/12/2009. (dmn)
March 12, 2009 142 Opinion or Order of the Court JUDGMENT and DECREE of this court as follows: (1) Defendants Paul Bowlin, Jimmy Butts, Margie Champion Todd Hopper, and DeJarvis Leonard's motions for summary judgment (Doc. Nos. 62 and 75 ) are granted. (2) Judgment is entered in favor of de fendants Bowlin, Butts, Hopper, and Leonard and against plaintiffs John and Theresa Sophocleus, with the Sophocleus plaintiffs taking nothing on their complaint because the complaint is barred by principles of state-law preclusion. It is further ORDE RED that costs are taxed against the Sophocleus plaintiffs, for which execution may issue. The clerk of the court is DIRECTED to enter this document on the civil docket as a final judgment pursuant to FRCP 58. Signed by Honorable Myron H. Thompson on 3/12/2009. (Attachments: #(1) Civil Appeals Checklist)(dmn)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Sophocleus, et al v. Dept. Transportation, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.