The Estate of Jacqueline McCarn Ingrum v. Financial Freedom Senior Funding Corporation, Inc. et al
| The Estate of Jacqueline McCarn Ingrum |
| Financial Freedom Senior Funding Corporation, Inc., Pacific Reverse Mortgage, Inc. and Shaun Donovan |
| 3:2009cv00255 |
| March 26, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Alabama |
| Real Property: Other Office |
| Lee |
| Terry F. Moorer |
| William Keith Watkins |
| None |
| U.S. Government Defendant |
| 31:3731 Fraud |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
75
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING 69 MOTION to Alter, amend, or vacate 68 Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge William Keith Watkins on 6/15/11. (djy, )
|
|
Filing
67
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER directing that: (1) defs' 30 and 33 motions for summary judgment are GRANTED; (2) the Estate's 34 motion for summary judgment on its slander of title and declaratory judgment claims is DENIED; (3) the Esta te's motion for summary judgment on its quiet title claim is GRANTED to the extent it seeks to quiet title to the property and DENIED to the extent it seeks to quiet titl in its favor; (4) defs' 37 , 39 , 45 & 47 motions to strike are DENIED; and (5) Financial Freedom's and HUD's mortgages are valid and enforceable, as further set out in order. Signed by Honorable William Keith Watkins on 8/27/10. (djy, )
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
