Diamond et al v. Hastie et al
| Anitra Diamond and Labarron Yates |
| Kimberly Hastie |
| 1:2015cv00204 |
| April 14, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| Kristi K. DuBose |
| William E. Cassady |
| Other Personal Injury |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
139
Order DENYING 138 Joint MOTION to Vacate Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 10/30/2019. (nah)
|
|
Filing
121
ORDER granting 108 Motion for Summary Judgment as to both claims. Whether punitive damages should be awarded is reserved for trial. This issue will be discussed at the pre-trial conference on June 20, 2019 at 2:00 p.m. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 06/18/2019. (nah)
|
|
Filing
106
Order DENYING 104 MOTION for Reconsideration which in turn MOOTS 105 MOTION for a Stay or Extension. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 05/21/2019. (nah)
|
|
Filing
102
Order entered GRANTING 87 Notice of Withdrawal filed by Labarron Yates, Yates is REMOVED as a "named plaintiff" and/or proposed class representative. It is ORDERED that the 78 MOTION to Certify Class is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 05/06/2019. (nah)
|
|
Filing
59
ORDER ADOPTING 54 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 37 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Class Action Complaint filed by Nick Matranga as set out. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 04/05/2018. (srd)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
