Fuller v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. et al
| Kathryn F. Fuller |
| Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., Winn-Dixie Montgomery LLC and Advanced Polybag, Inc. |
| 1:2016cv00363 |
| July 11, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Mobile Office |
| Mobile |
| William H. Steele |
| Bert W. Milling |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 59 Motion for Summary Judgment as follows: granted as to Fuller's claims for premises liability, wantonness, breach of express warranty and AEMLD; granted as to negligence; granted as to negligent s upervision, training and hiring; and denied as to breach of implied warrant. The Motion to Strike/Exclude 66 is granted in part and moot in part. Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Scheduling Order 82 is moot. The Motion to Strike 93 is moot a s to the third-party beneficiary claim and WD's objections are moot as to "Exhibit 3", and overruled as to "Exhibit 6". Fuller's Motion to Strike is denied, all as set out in order. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 7/18/2017. (cmj)
|
|
Filing
88
ORDER finding as moot 72 Motion to Amend Complaint; denying 73 Motion to Remand; finding as moot 79 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply ; finding as moot 84 Motion to Strike. Signed by Chief Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 6/2/2017. (cmj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
