Bender v. Mazda Motor Corporation et al
| Peggy Bender |
| Mazda Motor Corporation, Mazda Motor of America, Inc. and Ford Motor Company, Inc. |
| 2:2009cv00735 |
| November 10, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Alabama |
| Selma Office |
| Marengo |
| Bert W. Milling |
| Kristi K. DuBose |
| Both |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.) |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER denying 20 Motion or Relief from Order of January 27, 2010 & denying 20 Motion to Reopen Case as set out. This Court lacks jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) to reconsider the remand order. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 9/9/10. Copies to parties. (mpp)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER ADOPTING 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 6 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Peggy Bender, recommending that Plaintiff's motion be granted and that this action be remanded to the Wilcox County Circuit Court for all proceedings. Defendants' Motion to stay or certify for interlocutory appeal (doc. 17) is denied. Signed by Judge Kristi K. DuBose on 2/18/2010. (cmj)
|
|
Filing
16
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 6 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Peggy Bender, recommending that Plaintiff's motion be granted and that this action be remanded to the Wilcox County Circuit Court for all proceedings. Objections to R&R due by 2/10/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Bert W. Milling, Jr on 1/26/2010. (cmj)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alabama Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
