Belgrove v. North Slope Borough Power, Light, and Public Works
Bryan Belgrove |
North Slope Borough Power, Light, and Public Works |
3:2012cv00178 |
August 29, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Alaska |
Anchorage Office |
Anchorage |
John W. Sedwick |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 96 ORDER denying 46 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; granting 61 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge John W. Sedwick on 11/14/13. (NKD, COURT STAFF) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Alaska District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Belgrove v. North Slope Borough Power, Light, and Public Works | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: North Slope Borough Power, Light, and Public Works | |
Represented By: | Peter C. Gamache |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Bryan Belgrove | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.