Payne v. Astrue

Payne v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Terry Payne
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	2:2008cv01753
Filed:	September 25, 2008
Court:	US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW Office
County:	Maricopa
Presiding Judge:	Neil V Wake
Nature of Suit:	None
Cause of Action:	U.S. Government Defendant
Jury Demanded By:	42:405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
February 23, 2010	Filing 33 ORDER affirming the decision of the Commissioner and hereby dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint. The Clerk is directed to terminate this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 2/22/10. (TLJ)
October 19, 2009	Filing 24 ORDER that the Commissioner's Unopposed Motion 23 for Enlargement of Time Within Which to File a Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Second Request), is GRANTED. The Commissioner shall file his answering brief on or befor e November 13, 2009. Absent good cause shown, the failure to timely comply with this briefing schedule may result in a summary adverse ruling on the motion or no consideration given by the Court to an untimely answering or reply brief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 10/16/09. (Note: See Order for full details)(KMG, )

Date Filed

Document Text

February 23, 2010

Filing 33 ORDER affirming the decision of the Commissioner and hereby dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint. The Clerk is directed to terminate this case. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 2/22/10. (TLJ)

October 19, 2009

Filing 24 ORDER that the Commissioner's Unopposed Motion 23 for Enlargement of Time Within Which to File a Response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Second Request), is GRANTED. The Commissioner shall file his answering brief on or befor e November 13, 2009. Absent good cause shown, the failure to timely comply with this briefing schedule may result in a summary adverse ruling on the motion or no consideration given by the Court to an untimely answering or reply brief. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 10/16/09. (Note: See Order for full details)(KMG, )

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Payne v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Terry Payne
Represented By:	Eric Glenn Slepian
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?