WildEarth Guardians v. Jewell et al
Plaintiff: WildEarth Guardians
Defendant: Sally Jewell and United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Intervenor_defendant: Board of County Commissioners of the County of Gunnison, State of Colorado
Case Number: 2:2014cv00833
Filed: April 18, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Arizona
Office: Phoenix Division Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: John W Sedwick
Nature of Suit: Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 702
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 94 ORDER AND OPINION denying 91 Motion to Strike. Nevertheless, Federal Defendants may file a 20 page reply memo. In addition, the time for filing Federal Defendants' reply is extended to August 12, 2015. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 7/22/15.(LSP)
December 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 70 ORDER the motion to intervene at docket 47 is GRANTED. The Proposed Intervenors are directed to file their answer within seven (7) days from the date of this order. Proposed Intervenors are directed to comply with the scheduling order at docket 68; its response brief and cross-motion for summary judgment must be filed no later than May 15, 2015, and any respective replies must be filed no later than July 17, 2015. Furthermore, Proposed Intervenors are directed to consult with the Service and w ith the other Defendant-Intervenor, Gunnison County, before submitting any brief to avoid duplicative arguments and Proposed Intervenors' briefs should focus on arguments related to the potential impacts of oil and gas activities. The applicable page limits are set forth in the order at docket 40, except that Plaintiff may have an additional eight pages for its reply brief provided that those additional pages respond solely to any new arguments advanced by the Proposed Intervenors. Signed by Judge John W Sedwick on 12/31/2014.(KMG)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arizona District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: WildEarth Guardians v. Jewell et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: WildEarth Guardians
Represented By: Ashley D Wilmes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sally Jewell
Represented By: Mary Elisabeth Hollingsworth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Represented By: Mary Elisabeth Hollingsworth
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor_defendant: Board of County Commissioners of the County of Gunnison, State of Colorado
Represented By: David Baumgarten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?